Leeds Trolleybus Enquiry Day 6
Showing posts with label sociopathy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sociopathy. Show all posts
Thursday, 8 May 2014
Saturday, 3 May 2014
Leeds Trolleybus Enquiry Day 4
Leeds Trolleybus Enquiry Day 4
May 2 2014
Friday May 2 2014 was the last day of the first week of the Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry and the witness in the hot seat was Dave Haskins, Project Director for NGT.
The morning was spent with his own statement, followed by a cross examination from Neil Cameron QC for the Applicant (NGT).
Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry Day 4: May 2 2014 First Morning Session.
Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry Day 4: May 2 2014 Late Morning Session.
The cross examination from Objectors began after lunch with Gregory Jones QC for First West Yorkshire.
Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry Day 4: May 2 2014 Afternoon Session.
A major part of Mr Jones cross examination is focussing on the relation to the Supertram project which was cancelled some years ago. My own memory of this is a bit hazy, so it is extremely helpful for me, and doubtless many of those following this enquiry, to have some very detailed examination of it. (I used to watch Look North in those days, and I really don’t recall much coverage if any of that very important matter other than someone occasionally sounding excited about it.)
A major fact which emerged was that the costs of
Supertram were underpredicted by a massive 40% in the opinion of the then
Secretary of State. However Mr Haskins
would not agree, even after being repeatedly asked the same question, that
extreme caution had to be exercised in managing the predicted costs of such an
infrastructure project and claimed that he believed that he had effectively
done so. He referred to a letter which
his team had apparently written to the then Secretary of State in November 2005
contesting the suggestion that the costs had been underpredicted. This assessment of underprediction was based
on the bids that were made for the project, which were in the region of almost
40% higher than the cost claims made by the then promoters. The letter in response to the Secretary of
State has not been included in the evidence as yet, and will be produced later,
probably when the questioning resumes on Wednesday 7th May. There does not appear to have been a reply
from the Secretary of State to Metro at the time.
This was quite a complex cross examination to follow
and I was really glad of being able to listen back to my audio recording to be
able to properly understand it in order to write this blog. (It can be found from about five minutes
onwards on the audio from the afternoon session linked above.)
Two matters from this immediately come to mind. Firstly the obvious one that while Mr
Haskins does at least appear to have some knowledge of the Supertram, unlike
his boss Mr Farrington who had made no review of it, he seems complacently
overconfident that he can bring this £250 million pound infrastructure project
in on budget, and will not make a concession to humility and acknowledge that
extreme caution must be applied on budgets of such an immense size. (I’m looking into when this figure dates
from, as it may be some years old.)
The second is that this is a debate which it seems
Leeds City Council and Metro would rather was not made in public, since they
have refused to put in place any audio or video recording or streaming
facilities, despite that request being made by Cllr John Illingworth (Lab,
Kirkstall), amongst others.
The BBC too have almost entirely ignored the Leeds
Public Enquiry into the Transport and Works Act Order for the NGT
Trolleybus. Clearly the tragic incident
which occurred at a Leeds College at the beginning of the week has had a lot to
do with this. While that is a major
occurrence for the City, the trolleybus scheme is the largest potential infrastructure
project since the late sixties and would have an immense impact on the lives of
hundreds of thousands of people.
One can’t help being reminded of that assistant in
the Labour Party who suggested in an email on September 11, 2001, that it might
be a good day to bury some bad news.
Even the Yorkshire Evening Post, which has given more
coverage to this than the BBC, has not to our knowledge had a reporter down to
the Enquiry.
When I began making recording of the Public Enquiry
it was just as a kind of personal project, but it is now emerging as an
important document which is in the public domain. Council members may well have their own stealth recording going
on as I have heard rumour that the project management team are taking a feed
from the microphone system. I don’t
object to this for the management team, as it would primarily be for the
Inspector’s use I should imagine, and I think it essential that he should have
such a copy. But there should be
multiple sources, and one of those should be from the Council as the drivers
for this exercise and responsible to the citizens of Leeds for openness of
information. I am most grateful to the
Inspector, Mr Martin Whitehead for not standing in the way of objectors picking
up this responsibility.
The cross examination continued in much detail,
raising issues such as the massive overrun on the costs of Edinburgh tram and
the Atkins report. I am presently
somewhat impressed by the encyclopaedic knowledge of the subject which Gregory
Jones QC is demonstrating of the subject and his ability to take apart the
pretensions of the NGT project. I shall
have to write a piece on the way the Enquiry is working at some point, as it is
a fascinating experience to see such skill at work.
The Enquiry continues on Wed 7th May at
10am in the Regus Suite at Wellington Place in the city centre.
Thursday, 1 May 2014
Leeds Trolleybus Enquiry Day 3
Leeds Trolleybus Enquiry Day 3
May 1 2014
On the third day of the Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry we
found out more about Mr Martin Farrington’s value systems, and how little
research he has put into the areas which would be affected by the proposed
trolley system. I would urge you to
listen to some of the audio recordings of the Leeds Trolleybus Enquiry that I have been making with the
assistance of the gentlemen of the North West Leeds Transport Forum.
Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry Day 3: May 1 2014 First Morning Session.
Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry Day 3: May 1 2014 Late Morning Session.
Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry Day 3: May 1 2014 Early Afternoon Session.
Leeds Trolleybus Public Enquiry Day 3: May 1 2014 Late Afternoon Session.
The most extraordinary moment of the day for me was when
Mr Farrington said that he couldn’t bring the fields of Headingley Hill to his
mind. The largest and most complex
green site that would be lost, of the entire route, and he can’t bring it into
his mind. As if it was some little
detail that is beneath his consideration.
Well, he does see himself as a big
picture man, and he does like to delegate to his subordinates, like
getting them to write parts of his statement, for instance.
Rather than detail a list of things that Mr Farrington
doesn’t know or hasn’t looked into, I’d like to examine the psychology of
someone who would promote a plan which involves destroying green areas of great
character, in an area that he is forced to acknowledge is very short on green
space, and not even be able to bring to mind the places which he intends to
destroy. This is arrogance and
complacency of a fairly extreme kind.
It is fascinating to see the deadpan way in which he explains his
beliefs that the local community has been weighed in the balance of his
judgement and found wanting compared to the big businesses and shopping malls
of the city centre which he seeks to promote.
He was unmoved by the introduction of ideas by Chris Foren
(Chair of the A660 Joint Council) in his cross examination about how there is
an emerging view that in already developed countries such as the UK, further
perpetual economic development beyond a certain level fails to serve the
benefit of the people. Indeed it is
becoming clear to many that such over development serves only the limitless
appetites of corporate expansion and domination of our culture. Which, incidentally, many now recognise as
being the source of the ecological catastrophe we are currently facing on out
planet.
At its best, Utilitarianism devalues the individual human
being in its insistence that the happiness of the greater number is the basis
of good, and that therefore those who do not conform to this should be subject
to the influence and domination of that great number. But the present scenario goes well beyond even this travesty of
ethics. Entire communities and
landscapes are to be engineered for the benefit of those who see themselves as
the elites and worthy of directing the path of social development.
Just as Africa and the Middle East were carved up both
before and after the Great War (WW I) by Whitehall mandarins with rulers on
maps of places that they would never even consider visiting, we see our modern
Leeds City Council mandarins such as Mr Farrington carving up the map of Leeds
without any actual reference to the landscape or communities which have evolved
there over centuries. They are simply
to be deleted and overwritten like some memory card whose files are no longer
required.
I would suggest that this it is actually a pathological
state of mind that the steersmen behind Leeds City Council are in and are
attempting to inflict on its citizens.
They see themselves as knowing what is best for us and ignore the
citizens responses as I discussed on the blog for the first day of the
Enquiry. It is quite fascinating to me
to listen to how people like Farrington and Cllr Richard Lewis dismiss the
opposition to the trolleybus by saying that they expect to only hear the
activists and that really this is only a small part of the population. The absurdity of this position is exposed by
Chris Foren when he suggests that you can only count those who vote or express
an opinion and that you cannot attribute anything to those who express
none. I have already discussed the
immense obstacles, both practical and psychological, to be overcome in the
process of negotiating the bureaucratic assault course of participating in the
Public Enquiry on my blog for Day 1.
These people will do anything to ignore or deny the voices
of those who speak against them. And we
must remember that Mr Farrington is an appointed civil servant, not an elected
representative. He is a servant of the
city and its citizens, that is what the words ‘civil servant’ mean. And yet he takes the view that he can
exercise complete influence and domination of the citizenry without even
knowing those parts of the city which he wants to change. It is a form of sociopathy to have the
desire and intention of doing things to people and the way they live their
lives without any concern or feeling about how they would be affected by one’s
actions.
Some may feel that I couch my analysis in strong terms ~
pathological states of mind, sociopathy and the like. But what terms are available to us when these people seek to
exercise a condition of complete influence or domination upon us?
Such conditions can only be imposed through
immoral disregard of human rights.
Fortunately there is still some backbone of liberty left in our nation
and it has been heartwarming to meet others who are motivated to stand against
this tyranny, and to hear the denunciations of this sham. I am beginning to feel that the Public
Enquiry may not only roundly see off this trolleybus nonsense (which as Cllr
Richard Lewis said last year, is ‘more of a highways scheme than one of public
transport’) but that in the process we may gain a closer awareness of the dark
underbelly of Leeds City Council and the network of those who seem to have
hijacked the administration of our beautiful city and have been steering it
into troubled waters with their grandiose schemes and petty ambitions.
Please share the links to the recordings of the Public Enquiry with your friends
on social media. If you don’t have the
time to follow the audios in full and you just want to hear one which
will give you a good understanding of what is going on, listen to this,
starting about eight or nine minutes in.
Gregory Jones QC working on Mr Farrington and exposing the whole
nonsense as a house built on sand. It’s
also a jolly good laugh. I posted it to
a friend last night and said ‘If you start listening to this you won’t be able
to stop until it’s over’ and he tried to listen to only ten minutes before going
to bed, but he couldn’t tear himself away from it and listened to the whole
thing just short of an hour and a half.
The session following is almost as good!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)